?

Log in

anti war.'s Journal [entries|friends|calendar]
anti war.

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ calendar | livejournal calendar ]

Obama's Syrian Rebel Hostages Blow Whistle, Human Rights Watch Faked Evidence [14 Sep 2013|11:15am]

serendipityone
Originally posted by serendipityone at Obama's Syrian Rebel Hostages Blow Whistle, Human Rights Watch Faked Evidence
by Deborah Dupre Human Rights Examiner
September 13, 2013

A Belgian teacher and an Italian journalist held captive by Obama-backed Syrian rebels have blown the whistle on what Human Rights Watch, a front group for the United States Department of State, said was “compelling evidence” that the Assad government gassed its people.

The two freed hostages have indicated that Obama-backed Syrian rebels were behind the chemical weapon atrocity.

A Belgian researcher, freed from Obama-backed Syrian rebels, has denied what Human Rights Watch, a front group for the United States Department of State stated Thursday: that it had "compelling evidence showing the Assad government was responsible for the August 21 gas attack on a village near Damascus.

The gas attack resulted in over a thousand civilians allegedly gassed to death with nerve agent sarin and Barack Obama’s justification to strike Syria.

“Pierre Piccinin da Prata has given a sensational interview to Belgium’s RTL-TVI radio station where he stressed it was his “moral duty” to say that Bashar Assad’s government did not stand behind using sarin or any other gas on the outskirts of Damascus,” Voice of Russia radio station reports.

“The Belgian national said he learned as much from what he overheard in an exchange between his captors.”

Both the Italian journalist Domenico Quirico and the Belgian teacher Pierre Piccinin were flown home Wednesday after kidnapped and held for five months by Syrian rebel’s as hostages.

Quirico, 62, is a well-known war correspondent in Italy.

Qurico and Piccinin have indicated that Obama-bcked Syrian insurgents were behind the gas attack on a village near Damascus.

Human Rights Watch, a front group for the United States Department of State, said Thursday that it had compelling evidence that the Syrian government was responsible for the gas attack.

“Human Rights Watch (HRW) is an arm of the U.S. Department of State,” political analyst Don DeBar stated in a brief Skype interview Thursday morning. ”It and Amnesty International’s U.S. chapter have shared Clinton State Department functionaries as CEOs.

“Human Rights Watch always carries the U.S. Department of State line with respect to U.S. military actions against other states,” DeBar said.

Nevertheless, the front group's “findings” on the recent chemical attack of Syrians were splashed across United States news headlines Thursday, as though the reporters were from an independent group ethically investigating and reporting true findings.

Unlike legal authorities and genuine human rights groups, Human Rights Watch is, as usual, toeing the U.S. administration’s party line, this time defending the Obama regime’s intent to use military aggression against Syria – for humanitarian reasons.

Any U.S. strike on Syria would constitute a war crime.

Obama is replicating the war crime he committed in Libya with impunity. His CIA is now overtly transferring arms to the Syrian rebels, who are committing the worst atrocities in the nation, and blaming Assad. In Libya, Obama's Navy cluster-bombed Libya and blamed Gaddafi.

[See: PSYOP: US Navy cluster bombs oil-rich Libya, blames Gaddafi]

“[T]he entire region is suffering, damaged already from the Libyan expedition, the Iraq expedition, even the Afghanistan war that was started by the US in the late 70’s or 80’s which continues today,” DeBar told Press TV. ”Unfortunately I do not see peace in the near future because the government here in the United States will not allow it.”

[Watch Press TV's August 2013 interview: US govt. hinders peace in Syria: Don DeBar]

International lawyer and Kuala Lumpur International War Crimes Tribunal Judge Alfred Lambremont Webre reported to Dupré today about the HRW's “compelling evidence.”

“It is important to wait for the final reports.”

”One preliminary UN report suggest that both the Syrian government and factions within the rebels used poison gas on the Syrian population. Another report notes that Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad did not give the order ro use poison gas.”

Webre's reasoning might surprise some readers.

“If these reports prove to be true,” Webre stated, “then it may be the case that the reported uses of poison gas by both the Syrian government and the rebels were in fact a coordinated ‘false flag attack’ to trigger a U.S. armed intervention and an escalation into regional and perhaps global conflict.”

http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-s-syrian-rebel-hostages-blow-whistle-human-rights-watch-faked-evidence?CID=examiner_alerts_article
comment

As Russia sees the USA [24 Oct 2012|09:25pm]

ershowg

I want to talk about the United States from the point of view of Russia.
I want to tell you about Russia as it really is.
I'm not going to lie about Russia. Any Russian will tell as I am.
U.S. looks as aggressive and as a fascist state.
The Americans and the British brought to power in the Soviet Union Mikhail Gorbachev.
Today Russian know that Mikhail Gorbachev a traitor Russia. For what he destroyed the Soviet Union, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union Americans hired Yeltsin.
Russian President Boris Yeltsin continued destruction of Russia.
Russian people demanded a national leader and a miracle happened.
President Putin is a wonderful gift from President Yeltsin.
Putin is not dependent on the U.S. and leads the Russian policy in the interests of the Russian people.
In Russia, the president is not a puppet, but a real head.
Putin's bloody regime is a myth. This myth invented Western forces.
This is cheap propaganda. In the West, people believe in this myth. Our neighbors to the east in this myth do not believe. 
Terrorist attack September 11, 2001 was coined by the U.S. Congress. He was made with remote controlled airliners.
Due to the terrorist attacks of September 11, the U.S. came up with the myth of global terrorism. Under the guise of global terrorism the U.S. expand their influence in the East.
Indeed, Europe, Russia and the East, are aware of these crimes the U.S.. Such methods are supported monopoly dollar.
Central banks in most countries are totally dependent on the U.S. Federal Reserve.
Most of the world can not trade in their money. Foreign trade only through the dollar.
But still want to trade through its currency.
If someone decides to do so, the country is attacked by the U.S. Army.
Any country that is independent of the U.S. and Britain, Americans consider totalitarian.
Today, Russia is a strong country. We got stronger after the devastation of the nineties.
Russian government wants to restore the Soviet Union, but in another form.
Russia will have many allies in Europe and the East.
Russia is included in alliances BRICS, SCO and the Eurasian Union. Eurasian Union is an analogue of the Soviet Union.
These alliances have one goal. The purpose of this is to destroy the U.S. dollar as the monopoly.
This fall BRICS began to make external transactions through their own money. BRICS today refused dollars.
For the U.S., this means the beginning of the end.
World domination is based on the U.S. dollar. Printing dollars instead of real work. Very soon, this will not do.
When the dollar collapses, the U.S. could start a civil war.
Individual U.S. states will divide the property. Special services of Russia, Germany, China and other countries, will warm the U.S. population.
So we try to divide the United States. Our share is Alaska. Easy way to get just as easily and take away.
comment

Tony Blair at the Iraq inquiry. [29 Jan 2010|10:42pm]

atomic_joe2
Watching him on TV was a weird experience. He looked like a rabbit caught in the headlights initially until he got into his stride after about 10 minutes. Here he was finally before the panel in the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre in central London. After weeks of witnesses and claim and counter claim the main event and it was...anti-climactic.

Maybe it was because no sensationalist new facts about the war emerged. Maybe it was because it was hyped too much by an expectant media as 'the closest we'll get to a trial of Tony Blair'. Personally I would have had him appear at the very end of the inquiry after all the other politicians and lawyers had given testimony about the reasons for invasion, the war itself and the aftermath. I would have spread it over a couple of days so he could have answered questions about all that had gone before. As it was, today was what we got.

Bizarrely, I felt that he made a better case for invading Iraq today than he did in 2002 / 2003. I mean I still disagree with the whole damn thing and I would still have gone on the march in London against the imperialist folly had he put his case across then like he did earlier today. But today he seemed to be more sure of himself and secure in his opinion. I could be imagining this of course or maybe I've forgotten his style of oratory that was once so magnetic and thrilling he even persuaded Middle England to vote Labour in 1997 and 2001. He still had that spark on the 2005 campaign trail but it was diminished by Iraq.

There was one moment of twisted irony when he went off on one about Iran and the possibility of a future Prime Minister having to take a decision similar to his with Iraq, blithely ignorant of the fact that the very reason Iran is so emboldened and ready to provoke a game of nuclear brinkmanship with the West is a direct result of the US and UK prescence next door.

But in the end he didn't apologise. Not properly anyway. There was no Frost / Nixon moment. No admission of what we all knew: that he and Dubya had decided to go to war with Iraq months before, WMD or no WMD, UN resolution or not.

This inquiry is looking dangerously like a whitewash...
comment

Basil's Verse, War and Peace (Short Video) [28 Mar 2009|03:04pm]

thefaeryking
Many Blessings,
 
With the US going into Afghanistan the peace movement is far from quieted and disposed of, regardless of the historic election of President Barack Obama.

Many of us, because we are patriotic and wise enough to understand that you can't just stop policy on a whim, are giving him his hundred days.

Treasonous slime bags like Rush Limbaugh who wish the president to fail because he does not like his politics, regardless of how that failure would effect the citizens of this country are no better than the Nazi's of Germany of the 1920's before Hitler came to power in the 30's.

Peace Movement is a self-explanatory term. My spiritual principles dictate that life is sacred.

Please watch this short video and let people know how you feel, even if you disagree with me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXGJ0h3dz6g

Namaste,
The Faery King

comment

Fox News Hypes Missile Threat From North Korea? [08 Feb 2009|08:37am]

liberalviewer
On February 3, as North Korea planned to test launch a missile with a 4000 mile range barely capable of hitting Alaska, the Fox News story I saw covering the event was more an exaggeration of the current threat posed by North Korea than an accurate piece of journalism as I show in the 2 minute 15 second video here:



You can see the full Fox News story (in which Fox News anchor Bill Hemmer interviews neocon, missile defense advocate and never-confirmed GW Bush Ambassador to the UN, John Bolton) from which I took the clips for my video at http://www.foxnews.com/video-search/m/21826156/troubling_sign.htm

You can also find DOZENS and DOZENS more examples of Fox News bias on my Fox News bias playlist on YouTube at Fox News Bias

And, as always, I appreciate all feedback :-)
1 : comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]